Why Did Paul Change His Name?

Ron Cantor —  January 7, 2013 — 5 Comments

Why did a Jewish man get rid of his Jewish name when he began to follow the Jewish Messiah? Sounds suspect doesn’t it? Because it is!

The central author of the New Covenant—at least of the letters to the congregations—was a fellow by the name of Saul of Tarsus.  He was both Jewish and a Roman citizen not to mention an orthodox rabbi.  He studied under Gamaliel, one of the most respected Jewish scholars of his day.  He was so zealous for God and convinced that Jewish people who believed in Yeshua were deceived that he sought to arrest Jewish believers and even approved the stoning to death of Stephen, a leader among the first Jewish believers (Acts 7:58, 8:1).

However, on his way to Damascus to arrest believers, he was knocked to the ground and blinded by a great light.  Yeshua spoke to him and convinced him that he was on the wrong side of this issue.  After this dramatic encounter he became a believer and began to share the good news of Yeshua with Jewish people.

‘Also’ not ‘Instead Of’

Many years later, as he traveled throughout the known world seeking to help both Jews and Gentiles discover a dynamic, personal relationship with the King of the Universe, the Bible refers to the fact that he had two names.

Then Saul, who was also called Paul… (Acts 13:9, emphasis mine)

Sadly, for centuries Christians have taught that Saul changed his name to Paul after he became a believer.  In other words, he had to get rid of his Jewish name and take on a Christian one.  This is unreasonable on two levels.

There were no ‘Christian’ names in the First Century!

First, why would a Roman name be synonymous with a Christian name?  Roman heritage was a pagan polytheistic (belief in many gods) heritage and Rome became the primary persecutor of the body of believers for the first three hundred years.  Furthermore, there was no such thing as a  Christian Name! The name Paul only became a Christian name because of Paul. 

Secondly, if Saul truly changed his name from a Jewish one to a Roman one, then why did he wait so many years after coming to faith to do so?

Jews Get Two Names

Anyone who grew up in a Jewish home outside of Israel would know that it is common for Jewish people to have two names, one that is connected to the area in which they live and a Hebrew name.  My English name is Ron, but my parents also gave me the name Chaim, which is Hebrew for life. (Nevertheless, I go by Ron here in Israel because it is also an accepted Hebrew name and way cooler!)

When Saul was traveling in non-Jewish areas, he used his Roman name.  Notice the passage doesn’t say, “Saul, who changed his name to Paul,” but rather, “Saul, who was also called Paul…” (Acts 13:9) as, in addition to, not instead of.

Just today, I was listening to one of my favorite teachers on my iPod while jogging.  This man is an excellent bible teacher and he loves Israel.  He and his church have given sacrificially to the body believers here.   In his message he referred to when Yeshua appeared to “Saul”… then adding that he used Saul and not Paul because that is what “his name was then.”  If someone so bright and anointed cam miss this simple point, how easy has it been for the enemy to rob Saul, the second greatest figure in the New Covenant, of his Jewish identity and thus confuse the nature of the New Covenant.

What’s the big deal?

Good question… for which there is an answer. The enemy has worked hard to blind the Jewish people to Yeshua. However, the ancient Church has helped by de-judiazing many of the central characters of the New Testament. Paul is not presented as Sha’ul, a learned rabbi who followed the Jewish Messiah, but as a former Jew who started a religion foreign to Judaism.

Certainly this was not the case in his mind as he states “For this reason therefore I have called for you…, because for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain” (Acts 28:20). In the mind of Sha’ul is not suffering for a new religion, but the hope of Israel.

Let’s expose this Identity Theft and present Yeshua to the Jewish people in His original Jewish/Hebraic context.

Footnote: The name Paulos in Greek means small or humble. If Paul did take on this name later in life, it would not been to separate himself from his Jewishness (See Acts 21:20ff, Acts 23:6), but more a nickname that may have been given to him to reflect his humility, as he calls himself the least of the apostles and even the worst of sinners. Of course, his embracing such a nickname would not have been so humble, so I  am inclined to believe that he did indeed have a Jewish name and a Greek name.

Can you think of some other ways in which the gospel has been cleansed of its Jewishness? Use the comments section below.

EXCLUSIVE FREE BONUS! Subscribe to Ron's Emails get his Free EYE-OPENING eBook on the Israeli Palestinian Conflict.

THE 15 MOST IMPORTANT FACTS!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Donna-Diorio/740464794 Donna Diorio

    Excellent point, Then Saul, who was also called Paul… !

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/George-Austin/100000213590176 George Austin

    Amein. Great teaching! Twelve years ago as a typical Gentile Christian I heard a radio program entitled “Torah Talks.” That literally changed my life when I started to learn tidbits like this teaching – the Jewishness of the Scriptures! How arrogant I now realize I was to want to convert Jews to Gentile Christians. Keep up the good work.

  • JFKAR

    Great points, Ron. And since Rosemarie Pinto brought up Passover, can you reconcile the apparent contradiction between the differing accounts of the Last Supper in the Gospels? The Synoptics seem to present it as the Pesach celebratory/commemorative meal, but John’s Gospel has Yeshua (blessed be His name) being crucified as the Paschal lambs were being slain in the Temple, which had to have been *before* the Passover meal. I can’t explain this. – Joel

  • bob

    who really cares about a “pope” ???and who in their right-Christian-mind/spirit would kiss some silly/pagan ring?does ANYONE really believe the pope is God’s divinely ordained “voice” and final authority to Christians?!

  • sandnomad

    Since this discussion concerns Acts 13:9, I thought I would provide a comment. Since that passage specifically says “saulos de ho kai paulos” in Greek, which literally means “saul who he also paul”, then one can only assume that his name change was significant, even though we don’t know specifically who changed it, because names are very significant in Scripture, and a couple of good examples is the name of “Jesus”, which was very specific and commanded, as is recorded in Matthew 1:21 and Luke 1:31, as well as the name of John the Baptist, as recorded in Luke 1:13. I could name others, but it is throughout Scripture, and anyone can read it for themselves.

    If you want a rationale for the change, then read the book of Acts. Paul was considered to be great among the Pharisees and was from the tribe of Benjamin, which is also significant but would take a lot of words to explain. In any regard, we all know that Saul/Paul persecuted, imprisoned, and killed many Christians who believed in Jesus. Saul/Paul was so dignified as a Pharisee that the Jews who stoned Stephen laid their coats at his feet (Acts 7:58). Paul thought he knew all about God and thought he was doing the work of the Lord, but Jesus knew Paul was blind, so Jesus actually stuck Paul blind for three days, so he could finally see the Truth, and then sent him to the Nations/Gentiles to proclaim that Jesus was the Son of God. Paul would and did suffer greatly for the sins he committed against the saints (Acts 9:16).

    Well, I am getting off track concerning the name, but let me just say that Saul in Hebrew means “asked for/prayed for”, and Saul was certainly asking for it, because of his persecution of Christians. Since Paul was primarily sent to the Nations to proclaim Jesus, even though Paul actually proclaimed Him to the Jews, Gentiles, and kings (Acts 9:15), and since the Roman Empire ruled the Nations at the time of Christ, it is interesting that Paul in Latin/Roman means “little”, and even Paul considered himself to be so, as recorded in First Corinthians 15:9. Paul thought he was great in a carnal kingdom, but the Lord made him small, so he could become great in a spiritual kingdom.

    Since we have so many blind leading the blind today, it would be a wonderful thing if those leading were physically struck blind, so they could truly see the error of their ways, but many will remain blind, even though they think they see. They are wrong but are convinced they are right, as is recorded in Matthew 7:22-23. It will be a sad day, and it is no wonder that Jesus said so many times, “He who hath an ear, let him hear”.